Jump to content

Function Power 441 - Rapidreason


Recommended Posts

  • Advanced Members
8 minutes ago, TrueRedDevil said:

This is something that should have been part of Rapid to begin with. Why is it a separate power?

Because maybe by the time they made the power they haven't thought of this function and yes rapid could have been updated instead of making it as a separate power.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Volunteers

If you come with an idea, and an original one, its likely that you will get a test power if it gets made.

Helpernate first came with this idea, not Zuke. That, unless someone can state otherwise with forum archives.

 

I've linked Helpernate's post below:

 

  • Award 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Volunteers

Perhaps (rapid2) would be most fitting, anything else sounds a bit odd in my opinion.

 

4 minutes ago, Cupim said:

If you come with an idea, and an original one, its likely that you will get a test power if it gets made.

Helpernate first came with this idea, not Zuke. That, unless someone can state otherwise with forum archives.

 

Check the topic i've added above, this is basically what FrozenZuke suggested, he just thought of it as a addition in lang.

He posted on november 2016,  helpernate february 2017, it would be just fair to give it to both.

  • Award 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Members
1 minute ago, LaFleur said:

Perhaps (rapid2) would be most fitting, anything else sounds a bit odd in my opinion.

 

 

Check the topic i've added above, this is basically what FrozenZuke suggested, he just thought of it as a addition in lang.

He posted on november 2016,  helpernate february 2017, it would be just fair to give it to both.

this is what makes me think test powers should only be given to people would help test not just some random so they can profit from it

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Members

I would like to start off saying good job!

 

I like seeing these types of function additions added, and I also appreciate the fact that it was taken from a suggestion from the community.

 

Although I feel positive about this, I feel as if it should NOT be another power. It should simply be an addition. But this addition should be enough to NOT release a power this week.

 

So in other words, function additions like these should warrant for no power to be released that week. (due to the fact that these things need to be coded).

 

Just a thought : maybe the power in question that is being added should raise in price or something to cause some type of sales (for the sake of xat making some money|-))

 

Overall keep up the good work! @Maverick

  • Award 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Volunteers
6 minutes ago, Techy said:

this is what makes me think test powers should only be given to people would help test not just some random so they can profit from it

If you ask me, it doesn't matter what they're doing with the power, its a nice gesture from xat to give out the power for free to the person who came up with it.

I just wanted to clarify that on this forum, FrozenZuke got the idea first (doesn't matter how the implementation would be, new power/update of existing rapid power or lang, etc.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Volunteers

OK I'm turning the power specialist mode on.

Because in my opinion, Zuke didn't get an idea for custom-reasons on rapid...

But for rapid to be added to lang as a variable (so you edit the text and everyone else reads what you edit)

 

6 minutes ago, LaFleur said:

If you ask me, it doesn't matter what they're doing with the power, its a nice gesture from xat to give out the power for free to the person who came up with it.

I just wanted to clarify that on this forum, FrozenZuke got the idea first (doesn't matter how the implementation would be, new power/update of existing rapid power or lang, etc.)

 

Zuke suggested an update for the lang power. 
He wanted the word 'rapid' to be editable by the lang texts
That means, everybody who had rapid would still be banning for the same reason.
It just wouldn't print 'rapid'... but print whatever the main owner set at lang.

 

I'd consider him worthy of getting a test if he gave an example of how to add reasons but he went vague on saying:
"Maybe still have "rapid" in the reason for ban, but be able to add another reason for the ban."

 

Nate presented a method for us to add a reason through the current rapid method.
So if xat listened to Zuke, we'd have a lang update and no choice to add/type our own reasons.
But xat listened to Nate, so every user from now on can choose their own reason when rapid banning

 

I can see a big difference in their ideas and I hope I've cleared it out here.

  • Award 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Members

Yay, very happy about this power, but I'm more excited about the fact that you guys actually do take unique suggestions. 

 

I'm very excited to see what other functions you may make that are based on what a user has suggested. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Members

I think that is the same idea that has already been written here. By zuke & By gamesnathanlikes
But you have not really understood what function he has, because he has not given many examples, and you are not interested in that power.
It was just an idea, you had to fill in, and add function formulas to this power. To be explained more to understand the world.

I give the right to @LaFleur

It's a good idea, but it has already been given, and if it was written, it was not realized this idea, why is it now?

I think these three ideas are the same, but this is more explained.. I think it's a good power. (rolleyes)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Members
1 hour ago, 6 said:

Because maybe by the time they made the power they haven't thought of this function and yes rapid could have been updated instead of making it as a separate power.

I'd imagine editing an existing power would be easier than adding a new one.

 

Money over user satisfaction

  • Award 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Members
2 hours ago, TrueRedDevil said:

This is something that should have been part of Rapid to begin with. Why is it a separate power?

Agreed, there is no need to make a new power out of this. They should of just added it to the original rapid power itself. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Members
47 minutes ago, Loba922 said:

Then the new power id 441 would be called rapid2 or rapidban?

I think the best name is (rrapid) - Because it's banned with reason, and command. Rapid Powers - REasonn Rapid - banned rapid

It sounds funny, why it was not done UPgrade. (tired)
Because Fewer names of powers will have to remembre. xD

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Game Makers

The command is added above on how to kick as well with this power.

 

I will add the command here too: $rapid=kick,1,reason

 

You must put a reason or your reason will show "rapid".

  • Award 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Crow locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.