Bot Service Providers Popular Post Nathan Posted November 4, 2016 Bot Service Providers Popular Post Share Posted November 4, 2016 I think it would be a good idea to keep the classic pawn for good, instead of just extending it for a bit longer. Just as a reminder for all the awesome changes that have occurred since chats first came about. What's everyone else's thoughts on this. 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Cleon Posted November 4, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 4, 2016 yeah , i like the paw should be a free pawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bot Service Providers Nathan Posted November 4, 2016 Author Bot Service Providers Share Posted November 4, 2016 1 minute ago, Cleon said: yeah , i like the paw should be a free pawn I agree the pawn is pretty cool, but (classic) power would most likely always be required. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteers Crow Posted November 4, 2016 Volunteers Share Posted November 4, 2016 I'd gladly sacrificefor it! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Lalisa Posted November 4, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 4, 2016 Keep the classic and the blackcat pawns!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Anar Posted November 4, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 4, 2016 Just as Crow, I'm pretty sure a lot of people would actually buy the power more expensive if the pawn was permanent. So yes, I'd like this pawn to be permanent, it's pretty unique. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteers Lemona Posted November 4, 2016 Volunteers Share Posted November 4, 2016 100% agree with this. We have to remember that these are smileys we used to have that were FREE that got taken away. The fact that to use them again you must pay 750 xats is kind of ridiculous considering long ago we could have had them FREE. Having the pawn permanent would be MUCH more reasonable and a better reason to buy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Solange Posted November 4, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 4, 2016 I also agree with this idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bot Service Providers Nathan Posted November 6, 2016 Author Bot Service Providers Share Posted November 6, 2016 On 11/4/2016 at 2:12 PM, Anar said: Just as Crow, I'm pretty sure a lot of people would actually buy the power more expensive if the pawn was permanent. So yes, I'd like this pawn to be permanent, it's pretty unique. Unique it is, it kinda gives me a little throw back On 11/4/2016 at 2:38 PM, Lemona said: 100% agree with this. We have to remember that these are smileys we used to have that were FREE that got taken away. The fact that to use them again you must pay 750 xats is kind of ridiculous considering long ago we could have had them FREE. Having the pawn permanent would be MUCH more reasonable and a better reason to buy. Good point , I didn't think of it that way. 👍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Metig Posted November 28, 2016 Members Share Posted November 28, 2016 I AGREE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bot Service Providers Nathan Posted November 28, 2016 Author Bot Service Providers Share Posted November 28, 2016 Just now, Metig said: I AGREE! Its still hanging around! (Which is awesome) Hopefully they considered it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 I would like to see it permanent (if possible). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Anar Posted November 28, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 28, 2016 Looks like our wishes came true! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Metig Posted November 28, 2016 Members Share Posted November 28, 2016 Eyyy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Angelo Posted November 29, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 29, 2016 I agree, I'm just worried that if xat keeps releasing more amazing pawns, that admin will be reluctant to keep making power-linked pawns permanent. If classic is kept permanent, then we will currently have 3 power-linked pawns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Joyous Posted November 29, 2016 Members Share Posted November 29, 2016 I don't see what's wrong with the pawn other then that it gets confusing sometimes with the offline pawn. Haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteers Cupim Posted November 29, 2016 Volunteers Share Posted November 29, 2016 Sorry to disagree but I don't like the idea of having limited pawns to become permanent. I really hope that xat will remove the namewave pawns after some time ... About the classic limited pawn, it was extended for "a bit" more time. I like the idea of keeping limited pawns from expensive powers for longer than the ones from cheap powers. And it can last for longer than a week, a month. Well, maybe for over three or six months but not forever. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volunteers Crow Posted November 29, 2016 Volunteers Share Posted November 29, 2016 I agree with removing the namewave ones; they're not really necessary imo. But I would like to keep the classic one forever. To me, it's symbolic of the old era of xat - it's like keeping a little piece of the site's history. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Mencee Posted November 29, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 29, 2016 They should add them to the hat power then as unlimited hats (although, they should remove the namewave one that has the N symbol, no one uses it anyway). We've been waiting two months on new hats and we got one thus far being the party hat. and the initial thread was created last year on the old forum afaik. Both pawns from namewave and classic look nice and it's just added customization; should not be removed completely. Also let's not forget single has its own unlimited hat as well, there should be no issue with this. Edit: lol, jokes, one person actually uses it: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Anar Posted November 29, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 29, 2016 12 hours ago, Mencee said: Also let's not forget single has its own unlimited hat as well, there should be no issue with this. They are on the list of hats requiring a power; see the list here. 12 hours ago, Mencee said: Also let's not forget single has its own unlimited hat as well, there should be no issue with this. Yes, single has its own unlimited hat. I can understand this as it has form of utiliy; a broken heart is always useful . I really hope the namewave pawn will be removed from the avaible pawns too. I don't see it used and we had it for enough time. BUT, I definitely think the idea of keeping the classic pawn permanently is a great idea. A lot of users are using it and they love it! It reminds the "old area of xat", as Crow said. I think a lot of users would be affected if it was removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Mencee Posted November 29, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted November 29, 2016 I know about requiring the power, I was generally speaking. But to me, if you remove one, you remove the other, not remove one (namewaves) and keep the other (classic). I wouldn't be bothered if they removed namewave's hats, but I'm simply vouching for it because it's just more customization to our pawns. Also, not a lot of people use it because not a ton of paid users own namewave to use the pawn. The hat is pretty cool and I don't think it deserves to be removed. Single's hat has been unlimited ever since, same should go for namewave and classic, if you keep them for this long, no reason to remove them now out of no where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bot Service Providers Nathan Posted December 5, 2016 Author Bot Service Providers Share Posted December 5, 2016 On 11/28/2016 at 11:43 PM, Cupim said: Sorry to disagree but I don't like the idea of having limited pawns to become permanent. I really hope that xat will remove the namewave pawns after some time ... About the classic limited pawn, it was extended for "a bit" more time. I like the idea of keeping limited pawns from expensive powers for longer than the ones from cheap powers. And it can last for longer than a week, a month. Well, maybe for over three or six months but not forever. @Cupim We have been given a power to be able to use the classic smileys, i really see no harm in giving us the old pawn as well, for added user customization. The number of users using it, and those agreeing with this thread should also be considered. The name wave pawns could be removed and replaced with (classic) On 11/29/2016 at 5:37 AM, Mencee said: They should add them to the hat power then as unlimited hats (although, they should remove the namewave one that has the N symbol, no one uses it anyway). We've been waiting two months on new hats and we got one thus far being the party hat. and the initial thread was created last year on the old forum afaik. Both pawns from namewave and classic look nice and it's just added customization; should not be removed completely. Also let's not forget single has its own unlimited hat as well, there should be no issue with this. Edit: lol, jokes, one person actually uses it: agreed, remove name wave for classic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Edit Posted December 5, 2016 Advanced Members Share Posted December 5, 2016 yeah classic pawn need be permanent,that look to nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Bau Posted May 4, 2017 Advanced Members Share Posted May 4, 2017 Your dream has been accomplished! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advanced Members Rhea Posted May 6, 2017 Advanced Members Share Posted May 6, 2017 On 11/4/2016 at 2:09 PM, Crow said: I'd gladly sacrificefor it! yes ! I'm with Crow in this one. I love the classic pawn . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts