Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Advanced Members
2 minutes ago, Maxo said:

I saw the title i thought you're talking about me xD

Same, LOL (hippo)

  • Done! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Members
7 minutes ago, Maxo said:

I saw the title i thought you're talking about me xD

Hey Maxo (hug)  If such a power of ignore was created, I would not ignore you with that power. I put the name to ''max ignore'' because I think this power is a maximum developed power.

  • Award 1
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Advanced Members
On 7/9/2020 at 10:15 PM, Demonattack said:

excellent observation I also like the idea :p

 

Sometimes we may need such power, if there are people you don't want to see, it may not be enough to ignore them. it is a superior and very advanced blocking power that I mentioned here. It would be really good if studies on such xat blocking power could be done and such power could be designed. so we don't see trolls that bother people. yeah really good idea for a peaceful xat. Thank you for likeing my idea.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Contributors

I think with the power of HTML5 this is more likely than before. I'd be interested in just changing the Ignore feature into a block feature like other platforms with the use of a block list. The only issue I could see is if you're a mod or owner on a chat you'd have no idea if they were writing offensive messages, had an offensive name/status/homepage, etc.

  • Award 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Wiki Translators

I think that's a great suggestion, it would be very useful, I hope you guys can make it real with HTML. @xatstaff 

 

*NOTE: I would love not to have to see or read certain things and/or people.

  • Award 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Contributors

This idea baffles me to a certain extent, perhaps the most important one is in which how a staffer should behave if the idea is accepted.

Let's assume that a staffer, whether a moderator, an owner or a main owner, has the task of moderating the chat and to intervene if there are any issues.

In case this function is approved, how should a staffer moderate in case of trolls, flame, drama, inapp, blasphemy if the user in question is totally ignored?

I better explain this better:

  • USER X: IS TOTALLY IGNORED BY THE MODERATOR 
  • IGNORED USER: committing issues -


In this case who will supervise this? Rather I think if this were to be approved, it should be managed with gcontrol and determine if this can work for everyone or only specific ranks of the chat.

  • Award 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.