Jump to content

Daniel

Wiki Editors
  • Content Count

    1407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Everything posted by Daniel

  1. I'm in love with your brain.
  2. iframes with parameters: Link: https://xstah.github.io/i/1.html?name%3Dstah%26bg1%3D000000%26bg2%3D020060%26c1%3D000%26c2%3D020060%26c3%3D020060 Preview: https://xat.com/stah?new Link: https://xstah.github.io/i/1.html?name%3Dstah2%26bg1%3D006a4e%26bg2%3D2E856E%26c1%3D8abaae%26c2%3D5ca08e%26c3%3D5ca08e Preview: https://xat.com/stah2?new Link: https://xstah.github.io/i/1.html?name%3Dstah3%26bg1%3DEb5a46%26bg2%3Dec9488%26c1%3D933b27%26c2%3DCf513d%26c3%3DCf513d Preview: https://xat.com/stah3?new Try it yourself: https://xstah.github.io/i/1.html?name=stah&bg1=000000&bg2=020060&c1=000000&c2=020060&c3=020060 (& and = must be encoded before putting on chat due to chars being stripped) Limitation: with maxlength removed seems to be 119 chars. (Hopefully @SLOom doesn't mind I pinched his Rubyyyyy example with a few modifications for proof of concept)
  3. The wording here was a bit confusing. This clears it up for me: anyone who logs in with the group password can access the miscellaneous and mainowners sections, and anyone who logs in via their account password cannot (even "the actual group main owner"). I also believe miscellaneous should be moved to it's own tab to avoid confusion with this: It should just be completely separate and have no permission option. Also, within the appearance section of edit group, there's two background boxes and to me it wasn't immediately clear which one is which, as "group" doesn't really describe the page the chat is on, in my opinion. The top box should probably be labelled "outer background" and the bottom "inner background" as these two words are common xat terminology.
  4. Users having access to their own trade/transfer logs has been discussed to death in the past. Volunteers have always had an issue with this as they use this information to verify account holders on tickets, however this info would only be available after logging in so i never really understood it. I don't see an issue and would personally be interested to see this happen.
  5. Happy birthday, I hope you and your luscious locks have a wonderful day.

    1. Angelo

      Angelo

      Oh heck yeah, thanks Stah xx (smirk)

  6. Canvas' can also be manipulated very easily via the console
  7. Tested with LaFleur and couldn't reproduce using same macOS & Safari version as Nathan.
  8. What does this mean? i.e. does banning make you visible again?
  9. What's up 

    1. Lemona

      Lemona

      WELCOME BACK xat DANIEL THE WIKI LEGEND

       

      XOXO

  10. I guess they copied it from the activation email and somehow the encoding was messed up? Should be fine if you type the chat manually, or click: https://xat.com/frtka
  11. Browser? OS? Could be some weird .htaccess issue? I'm MacOS Mojave using Chrome 74.0.3729.131
  12. What do you mean removed? The chat seems OK to me.
  13. Oh I forgot about flapwn... nvm. Maybe a pawn that you can add a football strip that also has changing flags?
  14. I think most users actually wanted a pawn that would also be customisable. Could a permanent pawn be added to this power?
  15. Introducing xat's newest unlimited power: Tshirt ID: 547 Name: Tshirt Status: Unlimited Price: 229 xats Smilies: Pawns: The tflag smiley's flag can be customized by adding #wCountryCode, for example (tflag#wGB). See the flag wiki article for all available flags. The tshirts and tshirts2 smilies have alternative versions available, see them below: Wiki: https://xat.wiki/Tshirt
  16. How can you say it's serving its purpose and then say active staff is a problem? The truth is that if a user goes to the chat, they will be met with no active (or non afk, since you like to idle there, not counting today as you've clearly given a few people a little nod ) staff members, and be therefore unable to submit their idea. Whereas the forum is open 24/7 with users active all hours of the day, and Google Translate also.. Seems unfair, as when other official chats become dead the chat manager doesn't get to keep it as unofficial. They are redirected to other, more popular chats and the chat manager is all but included in the decision. Petition to redirect Feedback to https://forum.xat.com/forum/7-suggestions/? If users simply aren't interested and the chat is unused, then why waste resources and time? Official chats that do not serve their purpose (as mentioned above, and as shown after almost a year of nothing coming from it) should be redirected so that if users go to this chat they be redirected somewhere they can actually share their idea, as creating a chat called Feedback is clearly not as good as an idea as you thought.
  17. Any updates on Feedback chat, given that it's almost been a year? Any suggestions been posted from the users who can't find the forum (but can find this chat with no active staff members) yet? Time to retire the idea?
  18. This is actually a cool idea. Wouldn’t be massively used, but still a nifty little addition. Could also be named (awayreason).
  19. Daniel

    New protection

    I'm sure there already a feature in the works to re-introduce tickle. Regardless, I find your "Is it safe? [...] owned by Facebook" statement quite funny after all of the recent privacy issues with Facebook? Really? Also, this means xat has to store your phone number... which I am not to keen on them having, either.
  20. Nq83zdy.gif

    Sneak peak of Manage editor project I've been working on ;)

    1. Daniel
    2. Maverick

      Maverick

      Aha! Perfect. (goo)

    3. Cupim

      Cupim

      Amazing. 

      IT'S NOT JUST COOL

      It's amazing.

    4. Show next comments  3 more
  21. Daniel

    Language issues

    This should now be fixed (pending one more upload to fix default en to default international).
  22. Daniel

    Unban Reason

    Could actually be useful, sometimes you have to clarify with a staff member why they unbanned a user and with this they could provide a reasoning for the unban. Would be optional just like ban reasons.
  23. All contributors have talked about this month is adding their names to a wiki page for some recognition. Lit.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.