Jump to content

Christina

Advanced Members
  • Content count

    356
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Christina last won the day on January 6

Christina had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

534 Exceptional

About Christina

  • Birthday 02/13/80

Personal Information

  • xat Username
    Christina

Recent Profile Visitors

6098 profile views
  1. Community Choosing Volunteers

    Could not disagree more other then the fact that a poll can be rigged. Volunteers have to go outside of the box to actually See future POTENTIAL.
  2. I appreciate you mentioning me and always being there for me and looking out for me. Truth is I am debating if I want to partake in this subject. I also need to decide how I want to approach it. I guess with pride. For over a year I have fought for the voice of xat as a whole to be heard. I have fought with Admins. I have fought with volunteers. This is no secret. I have fought for the users. For me...seeing the community come together as a whole, and voicing their concerns and opinions and reaching out for that change that xat needs to thrive.....makes me proud. Seeing the few volunteers step up and watching them grow, and showing they care more about the users and what is best for the future of xat, makes me proud. This is my legacy....not some title. To move forward..we need change. This is clear.
  3. Poll On Why xat Is Getting Less Busy

    Think of tr4de and answer your own question @TinkerDoodle
  4. New Moderator: Angelo

    Congrats Angelo. You deserve this! Proud of you. I saved my like for you instead of the thread BTW <3
  5. 463 OCTO

    Amazing job Mike. This is now a great power <3
  6. Legacy Contract

    No one has any business to a users account. If the family wants something of value from it, whether xats or just the memories of the account, they can contact admins, as has been done in past. There are laws governing this.
  7. Titles and vote system

    I guess for me despite the safety issues and too address solely what most here have focused on... The title is a disgrace. One made up to honor those you choose. You have failed to honor the original volunteers before there was title listed on wiki. You have failed in giving someone title who was not a ticket volunteer, despite stating the honor is for those. You have failed at learning the history of the volunteering community and by classifying certain individuals who would not deserve based on the "standards" presented, while discrediting others. Congrats! It really is just some pretty colored letters on a forum that has 0 merit. I hope that I have enlightened some and educated others. Keep the title so as not to cater to those who may be bitter or weak as Steven suggested, if it makes you happy.
  8. Titles and vote system

    Actually i could debunk this whole false criteria, easily. There are things only old volunteers and Admins would know. I see honor given to some that were "removed", for example. However...my goal is NOT to take away from anyone, or single anyone out. Also you were not privileged to the discussions to state the anonymity given met only certain areas, while not others. These titles came only after your service, perhaps shortly before. I can also give you a list of classified volunteers who were NEVER listed on wiki, again is not my goal. I only answer to what you state or claim that I know to be false and untrue. Hense the whole I do not feel it is YOUR right or any of the contributors right to decide who gets what. Only Admins should have that call.
  9. Titles and vote system

    Actually Brandon..having these titles goes against what the past volunteers that you claim to admire stood for. They fought hard to get the ticket system anonymous. They fought hard to keep contributors anonymous. It is only important to a little clique who needs the rank. I can also state at least 3 current volunteers were "relieved of duties" in past. Will you choose to deny them as well? My argument on this still stands. Not you offering contributors a generic thread to vote, without knowing facts on each volunteer. Personally, it became principal for me with changing the "title" and others wanting to add things like chat owners, etc. Its downright dumb. Abolish the titles, period. They aren't needed. People are using it as a means to try and phish. And I know you see it every day. So you can continue to choose to ignore it and deny. But we both know the truth.
  10. <3

     

    1. Christina

      Christina

      <3  Hola Hermosa.

    2. Danny2024
  11. Titles and vote system

    I think that some of you are missing the point. The bigger picture is that it is being used as a way to impersonate and scam. Its worthless...just as you said Chelly. I do not want this personal, about me. Even though, I knew it would be. My example of the above volunteer, was not even me. No one has been a volunteer for 10 years for one, to make that clear. I also still help users without crying rank on any chat. It's just what I do. If anyone were to give such a title, it should be admins alone. Not users who do not know stories behind every volunteers decision to leave. Not a system that clearly uses cliques to promote. Anyone who truly cares about helping xat, does not care title. Lets also not forget how hard a few volunteers fought to keep an anonymous ticket system and the reasons behind it. These titles are going against everything they stood for. If you guys want to rip me apart and say I am salty..go for it. But I know I am right out of principal. You should all think of the greater good of xat and the users, focus on that, instead.
  12. Titles and vote system

    Do you feel titles are needed on a forum on xat. Or are some just over the top? I feel titles like "retired volunteer" is not needed unless you give it to all who volunteered their time in helping xat, regardless of the circumstances. I find it personally unfair because I see some people listed before it was discussed and everyone's business, that were forced out, have it. Who is to say that someone who was volunteer for 3 months and quit, because they could not handle the situation, deserves title over someone who helped 10 years. Who is to say that an argument with Admins, that resulted in a volunteer quiting, does NOT deserve said rank. The title also allows it easier to scam or phish users by impersonation. Users may think they are being helped by a retired volunteer. i see it done plenty. I have users message me direct to report that a user trys to scam, as me even. It hurts the community. I think the title clearly does more harm then good and should not be there. Retired volunteers truly do not care of rank, unless its only based on principal. My personal opinion is that each of us who truly cared for xat, would rather keep the community safe, not use it as a tool for popularity, and just see it abolished. I also feel the vote system is flawed. I personally do not like it. I can sit there reading a post and be able to tell you who the first 3 people to like it will be. I see it as a system of points you acquire from your friends. Its really never about the topic at hand much. I know some of you may disagree. But at least state good reason.
  13. How does it feel to know you still can never be me..no matter how hard you try.  

    Leaders are born and not made.  Or in your case bought ;)

    1. Guppy

      Guppy

      so pretentious 

  14. The first thing that comes to your mind

    Questioning integrity of some authority around here.
×