Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Paul

  1. 2 minutes ago, Admin said:

    > xc is used for internal things they call this "flags", you don't need that because on embed code isn't used.


    there may be valid reasons to set this but im not sure


    he wants don't sign in automatically which seems fair


    if he doesn't want to be signed in automatically why don't he just untick the box?


  2. 1 minute ago, iMoHd said:

    yes in code for chat you find for exemple Trade : <embed src="//www.xatech.com/web_gear/chat/chat.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" width="728" height="486" name="chat" FlashVars="id=5633523&xc=2336&cn=164911936&gb=7VcYp2&gn=Trade" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="//xat.com/update_flash.shtml" />  as you see xc=2336&cn=164911936&gb=7VcYp2&gn=Trade  how we can add it ?


    it would be [chat:728:486:5633523:Trade]

  3. 2 minutes ago, iMoHd said:

    for the code for exemple : id=5&xc=2336&cn=1960069554&gb=7VcYp2&gn=xat_test

    this code its open chat automatically you don't need to sign in i mean when i add a chat its can open automatically for users without they make sign in how we can add it with the new code : [chat:728:486:5:xat_test]




    it be [chat:width:height:chat_id:chat_name]

    like that but with your chatname nd chat id


  4. Just now, iMoHd said:

    iff users use bad code xat can bloc the user or the chat also thay can bloc xat.me for this user but not all embed for me i use embed to embed my chat box also i make change with poeple i use radio on my chat i use blog-tv for games between poeple chen xats bloc all wath's i should do ? @Paul


    It's hard to block every user right away, plus we don't know everyone on xat so some users could have bad codes with innocent xat users getting affected by it before we find it.

    • Award 1
  5. 15 minutes ago, iMoHd said:

    its hard xat.com should be free website we can add radioo also we change chat we make banner under chat and now they bloque all for me i don't like and i don't support this idea iff embed code poeple report abuse about it you can bloque the chat reported not the all embed :s


    The whole reason for this code change is to make xat safer for us, it is found this is the best way to keep xat users safe from users using bad codes

  6. Just now, Elie said:

    If blueman functioned like other expensive pawns, it would be the most popular one. It would be a huge (and wanted) improvement. Flashrank isn't enough.


    No one asked for emerald. It's plain ugly lol. The only good part about it is that you don't need everypower to use ruby anymore, and it shines a little smoother.


    I think emerald is better than ruby pawn, ruby is plain now

    • Award 2
  7. Just now, Lemona said:



    Ideas Views

    -Making the EP a different shade of green as it looks a lot like guest pawn or a darker outline

    -Exclusive kiss, hug and/or gift

    -Allow the pawn to be neutral and add the "everypower" effect to your current pawn colour (I.e Purple would have a purple everypower pawn, moderators would have a silver EP pawn). 

    -The Ruby's name effect to be more optimized or sparkly as it looks too similar to nameflag 

    -Pre-determined list of colors that you are able to use for the pawn

    -Add 3 custom color pawns ( not black and cyan ) and let them flash , or just an option where you can set your pawn to change from ruby to gold to purple to emerald in a loop.

    -Make Emerald silver/platinum

    It seems as though users want a lot more customization with the emerald pawn. Since it is a jewel, it would look a lot nicer to be able to use it with all the different colors of pawns (pink, blueman, gold etc) and your rank color. Currently, the pawn looks a lot like the guest pawn and could use a little bit of a new color touch.


    The Ruby's name effect looks very similar to something you can do with nameflag/namewave and would be nice for it to be optimized or have some sort of diamond/sparkly effect. 


    As for the community's thoughts on this as a whole, it seems as though people aren't the happiest about this change and still prefer the red ruby pawn. 



    Or make it Saphire

    • Award 5
  8. 2 hours ago, Admin said:

    Its been reported that embed abuse is ongoing so I have removed embed from edit


    it will be removed from all groups and profiles later


    Who would like to help develop a range of [] codes to put back the missing functionality ?



    1 hour ago, Lamingtons said:

    I said a lot of codes, btw if have more i'll say

    If one of us makes a new post here with all the [] codes, it be easier for admins to see them all at once.

    I will start, here are a list of codes that's been suggested:





    [fb:PAGE URL OR NAME] -- Display latest posts from a Facebook profile

    [fbbox:PAGE URL OR NAME] -- Display Like / Follow buttons

    [twitter:PAGE URL OR NAME] -- Display all latest posts from a Twitter profile



    You do mean something like this right?

  9. could add a button for these bbcodes to the toolbar, for an example YouTube, it asks for the size.you want for the player and link. (you could even have a tick option to make it invisible).


    EDIT: The tool bar on the editor, there should be plenty out there that let's you customize it

  10. 58 minutes ago, SJBB said:



    I have allowed xat.com and util.xat.com to use flash on chrome but even after its allowed, I am still having trouble using feature across xat?


    Here is what I have done: http://prntscr.com/e8syug

    Here is the error I keep getting: http://prntscr.com/e8sz6l // If I click to run all plugins this time it works but when I refresh or go to it again the same issue occurs.


    Any idea on how to do a permanent fix?


    I had an issue like this and i turned this setting to enabled chrome://flags/#run-all-flash-in-allow-mode

  11. 1 hour ago, LaFleur said:

    After some break, an update again!

    As always, don't forget to mention when bugs have been fixed (nice joke). Thanks.


    General: 53 @Kyle ; 54 @Lamingtons , 55 me ; 56 @Kayzar ; 57 @Lemona ; 58 @Elie ; 59 @Charles

    Bugs/Issues: 31 & 36-37 @deletedaccount1233 ; 32-35 @SlOom & @Paul

    Powers(Features) /Functions: 23 @Kyle ; 24 @Mario ; 25 @Lys ; 26 @Cyno ; 27 @Shake

    Power - Smilies: 56 @Flake

    Power - Group: 3 @SJBB ; @ider


    Number 33 is already fixed :) 

  12. 1 minute ago, Lemona said:

    Currently, to share an image with someone you have to send the direct link of it. So I don't quite understand how this would be any different than posting a gif in main when it wouldn't show directly in the chat. How would a sticker be any different than an animated smiley? Also, considering it takes a decent amount of time to get a banner approved, you have to remember that a lot of people would probably use this feature and the amount of items you would have to approve would be a lot for volunteers to even handle on top of tickets. You also could run into the problem of the gifs being copyrighted etc. Besides, do people really want to wait for approval on something that is so simple by just posting the link of it in main? 


    This shouldn't take long to approve them sine I said contributors could approve them, depending on how admin does it if it got done.

    This would be different from smilies and would allow users to have their own come up on the chat.

    The copyrighted shouldn't be an issue since that would be one of the rules, and we would check into them to see if they are free to use etc, but mostly it should be user made.

    • Award 1
  13. In pc is it meant to show different percent between the users? I saw 27% while the other person sees 50%

    not sure whats happening but the user said it goes to 50% right away and doesn't spin, the user sees the other ones fine when i try it on someone else

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.