Jump to content

oj

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    451
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by oj


  1. 13 minutes ago, Laming said:

    This is also something I thought about, because if this is added, then can be rolled back the Set Scroll api, if it is being abused vols can manage/handle or punish these ppl, and maybe admins can add more useful APIs based in this "key"

    Would also be good to have a button to generate a new API key, in case somebody who shouldn't have it gets it, or just an easy way to disable everything.

    • Award 1

  2. On 5/19/2018 at 5:50 PM, Laming said:

    It can be the k1 or k2 (k1 is fine since its updated every login)

    That's true, or they could just have an API key generator on login under the more button or something so we don't have to worry about exposing any account info.

     

    I was just thinking, when (if) this gets added, could the packet be changed so that the bot providers cannot change our info (without our API key), while still allowing users to send the packet to change our own?

    Then, with the API key (or token, in your post @Admin), bot providers can have a place where we input the API key on their site, which lets them change our info only if we mean for them to.

    Because as of now, bot providers can change our info without consent (if we have the power enabled), even if it's only until refresh.


  3. 20 minutes ago, Shizuo said:

    Where can we find you if we are in need of any of your designs except forum ofc, and what would the price be for any xatbox you make? 

     

    On 5/15/2018 at 11:52 PM, cynic said:

    You can add me on Discord (elena#0074)
    Or write a dm here on the forum

    • Award 1

  4. 17 minutes ago, Admin said:

    It would probably need to be something like:

     

    https://xat.com/web_gear/chat/botstat.php?u=638877683&r=5&t=6hfy6eyr6sk19vh&s=tacocat

     

    r=roomid (I guess i could do name as well)

    t=token

     

    would that work ?

     

     

     

    Yes, that's what I was thinking.

    Would you change &s for things like name, avatar, etc.?

    Like, https://xat.com/web_gear/chat/botstat.php?u=638877683&r=5&t=6hfy6eyr6sk19vh&a=144 for avatars

    And for multiple things, would work like https://xat.com/web_gear/chat/botstat.php?u=638877683&r=5&t=6hfy6eyr6sk19vh&s=tacocat&a=144 ? (I'm assuming this is the case, just wanted to double check)

    And as Sloom said, how would we get the token?


  5. 24 minutes ago, Admin said:

    Why is this better than setting your status on the chat ?

    Same reason botstat was made in the first place (I'm assuming), so external resources could be used to update user info (In botstat's case as of now: bot providers) automatically.

    Example: Somebody makes a hook for, say Steam, that when the user opens a game, it sends a request to this botstat API, and their information gets updated automatically on chat.

     

    This saves work//time instead of having to manually do $status=I'm playing Pac-Man., for every game/application/etc. you open.

    Or if the user has a callback for when they start live streaming to automatically set their status to "I'm live!"

    Or DJs on xat, to change their name to [ON-AIR] when they start broadcasting.

     

    This could also be used by/for other resources to do the same thing, depending on what information would be set.


  6. 43 minutes ago, Encrypt said:

    Maybe PCGBack can have multiple smiley backgrounds that change every 1-5 minutes.

    combined with random regular pcbacks, that would get a little annoying imo, but its w/e

     

    starting with just regular pc gbacks seems enough


  7. 8 hours ago, Laming said:

    Ok guys,

     

    https://github.com/xLaming/xat-botstat/

     

    Sending it to xat is not my problem, handle it by yourself.

    Unsure if you misunderstood the thread or if I'm misunderstanding you.

    Are you saying that the users should be the ones sending the final packet? Because if that's what you mean, you misunderstood my post.

    I'm asking for an official api hosted BY xat, not a packet builder for users to use to send the packet on their own.

    10 hours ago, oj said:

    lets people who are less experienced get some use out of this without relying on bot providers or client bots

     


  8. https://xat.com/web_gear/chat/botstat.php?u=638877683&k2=465465465&status=tacocat

    k2 or d3 i don't remember what gifts.php uses (i think d3, but k2 just for example)

     

    might want to include room id as well, unless it should update for all chats the user is on, or just the last one with activity was

     

    why isn't there something like this???

    ( @Admin , it would work like how gameban scrips unban the user, to update the info)

     

    lets people who are less experienced get some use out of this without relying on bot providers or client bots

    opens the door to a lot more stuff imo

    • Award 4

  9. 25 minutes ago, Maverick said:

    Great suggestion. However, it’s not that simple as “Hide inappropriate words.”

     

    Your J2 packet plays a big role here for your profile shadow and would require server configuration and finding, or generating values that haven’t been used which requires a bit work.

     

    If we allow users to edit some that J2 value (you can already in some aspects) then there’s no telling what some users can send to the sever or misconfigure some of that setting to do something harmful, or just screw up in some sort of way.

     

    A power would be nice to toggle on and off, but would still require coding work and some modifications from the server. Along side that, modifying packets that when you toggle it on, it vanishes for everyone, toggle off, appears for everyone. There’s a lot of configuration that goes in here. 

     

    I have asked XeR, SlOom and the Admins to take a look and give some more input with useful information here, as it would be something useful to have on HTML5 and Flash.

     

    Overall, this is a nice a suggestion and would be more than happy to help work on.

    if ((d0 & 32) != 0) {
    	this.Av.filters = todo.DropFilter;
    };

    technically it would be as easy as a "hide inappropriate words" button lol

    have the button toggle the bit

    server reads if j2 d0 & 32 sent by client and then changes the server generated d0 depending only on that

    then sends to everybody else

    ez pz

    • Award 1

  10. 5 hours ago, Potato said:

    I agree to what has said about the impersonation issue. I have a solution though. Allow capital i's as I but the L's stay capital no matter what. There would be no way to impersonate now and we can have happy capital i's. For example:

     

    If someone has the regname "Ioser" it would be logical that the l in loser is actually a capital i. Because if it was a lowercased L, by default it would have showed as a capatal L not l. 

     

    Hope that wasn't confusing!

     

    This isn't something that needs urgent alteration because we have all gotten used to the "L" "i" system by now but always fun to think of solutions and ideas :p

    Ima be honest, decent idea.

    But I'd rather i's always be lowercase and you could just choose between l or L. There's more lowercase L's in names than there are capital I's...

    • Award 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.