Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/15/2019 in all areas

  1. Thank you all!
    2 points
  2. Agreed. I'm in favour of removing the filter for subscribers and potentially adding a new gcontrol setting for chat owners. I think the positives outweigh the negatives. In fact, I prefer this idea to Cupim's. Users are less likely to misbehave when they have something to lose (i.e. their items). It creates a small incentive to buy days, for those who know about it. And it wouldn't create additional risk for chats where users are given member upon arrival (some unofficial chats are run this way) - which Cupim's idea might. I also agree with changing the limit text, whi
    2 points
  3. ID: 554 Name: Baby Status: Limited Price: 229 xats Smilies: Pawns: Wiki: https://util.xat.com/wiki/index.php?title=Baby
    1 point
  4. Solange (223326780)
    1 point
  5. oh my god... https://pointerpointer.com/ lmfao
    1 point
  6. 1 point
  7. More 5 to come, soon ! :D
    1 point
  8. A power to let users chat in peace and have an enjoyable experience to me seems a bit out of line. I have been chatting in stress and rage for the last 2 years because of the flood limit. I want xat to have more people If we keep the flood limit, more and more people will rage If we make it a power, then I may need to create a "flood limit anonymous club" to help people cope with it. 'Cause I can't. No more. xat must allow owners to decide if they want the flood limit restriction or no. That is simple. Simple simple simple. And it has to be
    1 point
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.